Monday, June 19, 2006

again...love??

By defining love I am not going to confine it in few hard and fast words. As per my understanding, love is a very subtle feeling. When I searched for meaning of word "subtle" in dictionery it returned following meanings:
1.Be difficult to detect or grasp by the mind
2.Faint and difficult to analyze
3.Able to make fine distinctions
4.Working or spreading in a hidden and usually injurious way(?)

I think these are self explanatory. If not perfectly, at least it suggests approximate context of love depending on individuals. Our teacher used to say, "Love is spontaneous emission of highly emotional radiations from one heart to other." But with time I learnt that love is not spontanious. It is well understood and dedicated feeling. I say dedicated instead of commited. Because in one of discussions with my friends concluded saying, "Commitment may come even if you don’t like the job/wife. But for dedication you must like it. That’s your incentive… you get satisfaction from doing it well. As you said, it’s the outcome of inspiration."

Other thing which I realised just now is love teaches us to make fine distinctions. Earlier I used to say 'Those who are in love or claim to have found true love cannot hurt any one espacially their parents'. But then making subtle distinctions in roles we have to play is an art. And it depends a lot on understanding of counterpart too.

Caring each other is the one which make us feel or discover love. Trust and Ego are two sides of a coin. "S/he must trust me ". or "trust must be there" attitude can hurt the couple beyond repair. Because you will not be in mood to forgive even a silly mistake by companion. By being caring trust automatically comes. Trust is needless to ask or remind.

2 Comments:

At 1:39 AM, Blogger Joy Forever said...

Oh.. so this was the purpose of that discussion about dedication and commitment?
I feel trust is a must in love... Ego is necessary to some extent, but true love always overcomes ego.

 
At 11:29 PM, Blogger abhijit said...

@sugata: hummm...It was not the purpose of commitment/dedication discussion. It is the use of outcome of that discussion. That discussion was not triggered by any other icident or topic.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Check from where blog is accessed.

Locations of visitors to this page